Space exploration is widely recognised around the world by the enormous benefits that it has brought to human beings. However, the money invested in it could be more effectively applied, and I completely with this opinion for a range of reasons.
The human curiosity about life outside our Earth might never be halted results in ambition to discover novelties midst immense universe. This combines with advance in technology allows us to fly further to conduct research in the infinite space. Nonetheless, people do not implement space research simply for contenting interest, those explore, by contrast are scientifically and economically useful. Take meteorology for example, weather forecast that we watch every day is strongly relied on artificial satellites. Furthermore, the satellites system is also serving as a fundamental basement structure of the Global positioning system (GPS). Theoretically, in the near future astronomers believe that human beings can exploit variety of precious natural resources such as minerals, sources of energy from asteroids.
Nevertheless, throughout the history, humanity did not take advantage effectively of all resources we had. Besides glamorous successes, some high-cost satellites were burnt out due to imprudence in launching processes. Another reason that triggers off ineffective utility of money allocated for space research is the competition between dominant countries in space affair. In the mid of the twentieth century, the cold war between the USA and USSR spread over space exploration. Scientific discoveries and patents that cost abundantly of resources to explore were not shared between two nations ended up in wasting budget. Though the cold war has ended already, the rivalry in space racing still exists nowadays.
In conclusion, space research is undeniably beneficial in present-day and future life of humanity and thus should be encouraged to develop. However, a better comprehensive co-operation need to be enhanced between countries to handle more usefully all resources we own.
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 89
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 89
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment poverty and animal welfare than previous generations What is your opinion 73
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 89
- The money spent on space research has brought enormous benefits to mankind but it could be more usefully applied How far do you agree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'satellites'' or 'satellite's'?
Suggestion: satellites'; satellite's
...artificial satellites. Furthermore, the satellites system is also serving as a fundamental...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, still, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68181818182 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02117673346 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655844155844 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.2735163995 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201738022553 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580237526484 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546933939383 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133477103204 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610232563453 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.