Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam
how true do you think this statement is?
what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars?
Taking for granted that the high volume of traffic generates a desire for more space, which is greater than the available of streets capacity. This occurs since demanding on cars is, in the recent years, growing radically. In my opinion, I confirm the verity of this phenomenon due to some compelling reasons. Within this context, these compelling reasons and their feasible solutions will be tackled.
The population explosion is likely to be the main cause of the traffic congestion in the metropolitan areas. In other words, the population census is rising significantly because of the domestic migration from rural idyll to metropolitan areas. Accordingly, roads are overloaded with an enormous number of either cars or lorries, and these considerable number led to disrupting traffic severely. Moreover, the condition of the public transport, which is deteriorated, contributes to traffic congestion. For example, a substantial proportion of people prefers driving their cars to commute daily to work rather than using public transportation, for cars now are affordable. Hence, the problem stems from not only increasing in the population but also dropping in the car price.
However, urban sprawl to secluded places deems as a paramount importance to cope with traffic jam. By improving public transportation infrastructure in the low density residential are, a large portion of citizen will rely more on commuting by public transportation compared to driving cars. Consequently, the burden on city streets will be eased, so the traffic will be light. For instance, in Canada, a brilliant development plan, which is upgrading railway network and building more stations as well, has been implemented by the government in order to assist citizens to travel. The heavy traffic, therefore, will be reduced.
In conclusion, I agree that cars associate with traffic congestion which poses a credible threat. I also believe that improving public transport is a convenient way to encourage people to use them so this could decline in demand for owning cars.
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home to work, shopping and education.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge To what extent is this a positive or a negative development 82
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation. Why is this the case? What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people? 61
- Some parents buy their children a large number of toys to play with. What are the advantages and disadvantages for the child of having a large number of toys?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experie 61
- There have been some problems with public transportation in your area recently.Write a letter to the management of the public transport company. In your letter-Describe the problems- Explain how these problems are affecting the public- Suggest some change 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Taking for granted that the high volume ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... feasible solutions will be tackled. The population explosion is likely to be...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... but also dropping in the car price. However, urban sprawl to secluded places...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...traffic, therefore, will be reduced. In conclusion, I agree that cars associa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41925465839 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03270529657 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599378881988 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0803078798 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.647058824 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41176470588 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179117927923 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549051855377 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387921314462 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10916277456 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400530514221 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.