From yesteryear, there are multifarious changes have witnessed in terms of size of family as well as its members responsibility. According to my diagnosis, this phenomenon has progressive modifications which are reasonable for people and the main alterations have occurred in works of each house member.
The predominant factor to notice in present group structure is for earners. To be more precise, currently mother and father both do jobs or business to fulfill their needs; however in previous year only one breadwinner gave the requirements to other candidates. Furthermore, these days mostly families are nuclear, while that were jointed or large in 19 centuries. For example, India had numerous families which were living together owing to the fact that of their agriculture that was possible with several workers, in contrast professions have been changing along with this family structure are also changing.
Beneficial repercussions can be seen from those rendered
variations. Firstly, it reduces discrimination between genders. To explain, it is prolonged in society men made for work and women did only household chores, it has been proved wrong by doing work all members. Females also get a chance to be self dependent. What is more, minor conflicts would be decreased as in large families people fight for such conditions, but when they live in nuclear one they can survive happily.
In conclusion, altering of structure and duty of family candidate changed which provide commendable advantages to all society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42677824268 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96676029323 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.694560669456 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8870427835 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.083333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0653786714396 0.244688304435 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0199188159393 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0268760231749 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0305109077488 0.151304729494 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236305861159 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.