cause and effect of labor export after graduating from high school
According to the Department of Overseas Labour, total the number of Vietnamese workers working abroad is 72,294 people in 2023, more than 1.55 times the same period last year. Especially, among them, more than 10,000 are recent high school graduates. There are several causes and effects that contribute to the phenomenon of labor export after graduating from high school.
The first reason is they hope to promising income abroad. Normally, If fresh graduates of high school do not choose to continue to study, they will make money. Instead of accepting a low-paying domestically that barely covers their life, they want to out of the country to change their lives. Moreover, the government has implemented policies to promote labor exports. For example, the government promulgated a loan policy to support labor exports. This, combined with the increasing income expectations in foreign job markets has led to a desire among high school graduates to engage in labor export.
The government and society should take this problem more seriously because it has adverse effects. On top of that, It brings heart-rending accidents. Because recent graduating high school students lack knowledge about social, thus, they hard to adapt to a new environment. For example, a Vietnamese boy was killed by an Indonesian in Osaka, Japan last year. Additionally, it is wasting Vietnam’s labor resources. Although Vietnam is experiencing a golden population structure, if we try to be the lead center of labor export then Vietnam will lack quality labor resources in the future.
To sum up, labor exports among recent high school graduates can be attributed to income expectations and government policies. However, it is crucial for the government and society to address this issue seriously due to its negative effects. Furthermore, ensuring the safety and well-being of these young workers abroad and considering the impact on Vietnam's labor resources should be a prior
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-02 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Tranquy | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | buahkiwienak | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | Penelope Eckart | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | mpragnya | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, well, for example, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34838709677 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80568027962 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590322580645 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1211519005 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1111111111 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38786176772 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1156333842 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180702311173 0.0667982634062 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229446331186 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931788146896 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.