Causes of unemployment nowadays
Unemployment is a big problem for individuals, communities and society. A question is raised what causes this problem. In my opinion, overpopulation, lack of appropriate qualifications and Covid-19 pandemic have been responsible for joblessness.
In the first place, increased population is one of the main reasons for unemployment. Obviously, when overpopulation occurs, the number of applicants are much more than the number of job. Therefore, many people find difficult to have a job. According to the statistics from National Statistics Bureau, in Vietnam in 2018, the population increased which makes the unemployment rate reached up to 25 percent compared to in 2015.
Secondly, it is the lack of qualification for employers which results in this problem. In fact, many graduates are unemployed due to their lack of not only appropriate qualifications but also necessary skills for their job responsibility such as communication skills and group working skills. For example, a survey conducted by Social Journal published that in 2019 in Vietnam only 10 percent of university leavers had a job, meanwhile the rest did not seek for a job because they are deficient in these practical skills.
Finally, Covid-19 pandemic which we are facing with now is one is the clear reasons for high rate of unemployment. Indeed, during Covid-19 pandemic, many governments all over the world imposed social distance method to prevent from the spread of the pandemic. Many public areas, enterprises, restaurants had to closed for weeks even months. In addition, residents were required to stay their home instead of gathering or going to work. Although this method is very effective on districting the spread of the pandemic, the livelihood of people were seriously threaten at that time.
In conclusion, there are some main reasons for unemployment including the increased population, the lack of qualification for applicant and global pandemics. To tackle this problem some practical and effective solutions should be taken as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | zanzendegi | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | zanzendegi | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | vidung | 87 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44339622642 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16320471795 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6871126718 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.823529412 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58823529412 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0779759825704 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277305317001 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460327105241 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529031320761 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430880603051 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44339622642 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16320471795 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6871126718 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.823529412 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58823529412 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0779759825704 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0277305317001 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460327105241 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529031320761 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430880603051 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.