Cellphones have affected human interactions negatively.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is often believed that human relationships have been affected by mobiles negatively. Although I agree that this kind of technology has a major repercussion on individuals, I think that using smartphones has its own merits. This essay will discuss both perspectives and put forward several examples and justifications in this regard.
Virtually every person, the world over, confirms that cellphones give people the authority to communicate with others from all over the world they otherwise lacked. the chief reason why humans can make such global interactions is that some companies are using smartphones as a suitable platform to develop unprecedented applications such as Telegram, Instagram, and Whats app in order to make these cosmopolitan relationships happen. For instance, as a sociology enthusiast, I have incontrovertible evidence in which it points out that as Iranian people are increasingly using Telegram through their personal phones, the rates of their foreign friends are rising strikingly, and that definitely, their cognition, as well as knowledge about different countries, are growing. To sum up, cellphones provide unparalleled opportunities in making global connections.
On the other hand, mobile telephones enable humans to make fake relationships. Interrogating the existing axioms about digital telephones, it makes sense that because people are not able to see each other, they can easily change their ages or personalities. My country, Iran, can be considered as the best illustration in this respect. Not only is Iran fighting cellphone scams, but it also going through the highest level of fake interactions especially among younger adults. As a result, smartphones are kinds of technology whereby people can deceive each other.
In conclusion, it is thought that personal mobiles have a negative impact on human communications. Given these solid arguments, I hereby believe that however they have considerable consequences, they can provide extraordinary circumstances in human relationships.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-18 | wholemilk | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-18 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-18 | Trần Ánh Vy | 56 | view |
| 2024-09-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-09-11 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is often believed that human relation...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...les and justifications in this regard. Virtually every person, the world over, ...
^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...l over the world they otherwise lacked. the chief reason why humans can make such g...
^^^
Line 4, column 367, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ations such as Telegram, Instagram, and Whats app in order to make these cosmopolitan...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tunities in making global connections. On the other hand, mobile telephones ena...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...whereby people can deceive each other. In conclusion, it is thought that person...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73267326733 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30676600184 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643564356436 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.3874303624 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.071428571 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162555578766 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550826316458 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549694877801 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970091703483 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340620785572 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.