The chart below shows the energy (million units) generated by wind in four different countries in 1985 and 2000.
The chart gives information about wind energy generation in four different countries between 1985 and 2000.
It is clear that all countries increased in energy production except Germany in the last given year. Besides, the US was by far the most produced wind energy in both years.
In 1985, the US produced around 120 million units, double that of Germany, then the figure rose to approximately 140 million units in the year 2000. By contrast, Germany’s trend was opposite of the US. Germany produced under 60 million units in 1985 and dropped away around 50 million units in the year 2000.
India and Denmark produced less wind energy than the other two countries. In 1985, the figure for wind energy production in India increased significantly by 30 million units and nearly equaled Germany in 2000 with around 40 million units. Denmark had the same upward trend, its figure rising to 20 million units in 2000, half that of Germany. Despite the slight increase in wind energy production in Denmark, this country was still the least productive.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-18 | Nguyễn Nhật | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the energy million units generated by wind in four different countries in 1985 and 2000 73
- The chart below shows the energy million units generated by wind in four different countries in 1985 and 2000 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The chart gives information about wind e...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erent countries between 1985 and 2000. It is clear that all countries increased...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st produced wind energy in both years. In 1985, the US produced around 120 mill...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...around 120 million units, double that of Germany, then the figure rose to approxi...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...und 50 million units in the year 2000. India and Denmark produced less wind ene...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 1615.20841683 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 176.0 315.596192385 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98863636364 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45578146489 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 176.041082164 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556818181818 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 506.74238477 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0001562496 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438637988981 0.244688304435 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176878973807 0.084324248473 210% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139139136984 0.0667982634062 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293750140352 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147789449674 0.056905535591 260% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 78.4519038076 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.