The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram below display how residential prosperities of prices have changed in five different cities compared to their prices in 1989.
During the period from 1990 to 1995 the average prices of house in three countries decreased significantly by 5 percent in New York (USA), about 7.5 percent in both Tokyo (Japan) and London (UK). The chart also shows that Marid (Spain) and Frankfurt (Germany) were 2 countries where prices rose sharply, with 2 percent in Marid (Spain) and 2.5 percent in Frankfurt (Germany)
Next, the second chart, the period from 1996 to 2002, there was a significant change from 5 countries when there was an upward of trend of 4 countries. In New York it increased dramatically by 5 percent, in Marid it slightly raised by 4 percent, in Tokyo it grew positively 2.5 percent but it was still in the negative side of the chart, and in London it rapidly increased by 12 percent. In contrast, Frankfurt of Germany was the only country in the rest of the chart where house prices fell, with the value changing from 2.5 percent to 1 percent.
All in all, London which was the country with the most significant increase in the chart by raised nearly 19.5 percent. Furthermore, there was a wide differences in average prices of house among 5 countries, this can be the result of overpopulation in each countries can made a trend of raised prices of house in a certain city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-31 | hoanphuoc | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-25 | luftmensch | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...matic upward, with long distance bus at the begin with 54 miles in 1985 and in the year 2...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.22262773723 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.05467969975 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463503649635 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 39.0 22.4926829268 173% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.721601141 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.285714286 112.824112599 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 39.1428571429 22.9334400587 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167087308906 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137504012626 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.169126970795 0.0843802449381 200% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197015380885 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.198673041346 0.0819641961636 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.2329268293 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.79 11.4140731707 68% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.6 10.9970731707 160% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.