The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the figures about how much female members of parliament in European countries.
Overall, it can be seen clearly that four countries except Belgium had a rise while Belgium witnessed a gradual fall.
First, looked at in the first period that it started in 2000 and end in 2004. Begium was about 16% - 17% in 2000. and it increase remarkably. United Kingdom witnessed a sharp climb in 2004, two times as high as in 2000. Italy was about 26% in 2000, it rise gradually in the next five years. France went up sharply about the next 4 years and reached of a peak above 35% in 2004. Germany was rose slowly between 2000 and 2004.
Second, from 2004 and 2012, it saw a lot of changes in all countries. UK continued to rise sharply from 2004 to 2012. In 2012, it reached approximately 27%, in comparison with 10% in 2004. Begium increased gradually in 2008. After that, it fell slightly. Frace had a fluctuation. It saw a significant decline in 2008. Then a steady growth in 2012. Italy climbed slowly in 2008. Then it rose sharply and reached at approximately 40%, on top of the peak. Germany stayed unchanged between 2004 to 2008. Then it did not change much due to a gradually increase in 2012.
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in European countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 56
- The diagrams below show two cutting tools made from stone They are from an early period and a later period of human history The tools were made by breaking off small pieces of stone Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an 67
- The plans below show the ground floor of a library in 2001 and how it was redeveloped in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...04. Begium was about 16% - 17% in 2000. and it increase remarkably. United Kingdom ...
^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...ium was about 16% - 17% in 2000. and it increase remarkably. United Kingdom witnessed a ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
...n 2000. Italy was about 26% in 2000, it rise gradually in the next five years. Franc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 535, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...008. Then it did not change much due to a gradually increase in 2012.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 1615.20841683 62% => OK
No of words: 219.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57077625571 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50903738415 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557077625571 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 506.74238477 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.60771543086 75% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 10.0 20.2975951904 49% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1131325507 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 47.6666666667 106.682146367 45% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.4285714286 20.7667163134 50% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.90476190476 7.06120827912 27% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.047468940566 0.244688304435 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0129871736893 0.084324248473 15% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435111545849 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599718385969 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824172605544 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.3 13.0946893788 40% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 95.17 50.2224549098 189% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 2.5 11.3001002004 22% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.75 12.4159519038 62% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.58950901804 82% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 78.4519038076 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.1190380762 59% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 10.7795591182 56% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.