The chart shows requests for information at a tourist office in the United Kingdom from January to June.
The diagram depicts the frequency people contacting to tourist office to ask for information by three methods including in person, by letter or mail and by telephone in the United State from January to June. Overall, either number of contacts to the tourist office in person or by telephone grew substantially, whereas the number of contacts direct at the tourist office increased from the lowest to the predominant, followed by telephone. By contrast, sending emails or letters to tourist office plunged considerably during this period.
In January, in-person information requests were the lowest among the 3 demographics (just over 400), after which saw a double increase to 800 in March and then its figure rose steadily to 1000. From mid-March onward, in-person queries rocketed consistently and finally ended with the figure being recorded at approximately 1900 in June.
Turning to the remaining means of contact to the tourist office, telephone requests fluctuated from roughly 900 to 1000 between January and March and stayed unchanged until April before reaching 1600 in June. Notably, letter and email requests witnessed a converse pattern, its figure started at below 800 in January, followed by a plunge in the next 3 months (approximately 600) and finally hit a bottom at about 390.
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features of the graph and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The world has many towns and cities constructed in previous centuries that were more suitable and livable for people in those times than they are now What problems will this cause What can be done to solve these problems 73
- Some people have benefited from modern communications technology but some people have not benefited from it at all To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 207.0 315.596192385 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25120772947 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79135100116 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 176.041082164 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584541062802 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.4600449862 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.285714286 106.682146367 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5714285714 20.7667163134 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332276590563 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144885996525 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808050871403 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206383458548 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0845637702896 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.