the charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019

Essay topics:

the charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and the amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.

Given are two charts depicting the fluctuation in possessing electrical devices of citizens and the time spent on doing housework over a century, starting from 1920.
It is perceptible that both the percentage of family units possessing refrigerator and vacuum cleaner witnessed an upward trend a fluctuation in using washing machine was recorded. On the other hand, with the popularity of electrical devices, people are able to reduce the housework hours.
Conspicuously, no one preserved their food in cold temperature in the earliest year. However, an increase in people knowledge lead to the dominance in the use of refrigerator, the proportion of households owning this device soared to 90% in 1960, with higher frequency in appearance compared to any household electrical equipment at that time. While washing machine witnessed a rising period, vacuum cleaner was another equipment that witnessed an exponential growth in a whole period. Possessed 30% in 1920, its tendency kept climbing up to 90% in 1980. In the latest two years, all residents were interested by purchasing refrigerator and vacuum cleaner. On the other hand, the use of washing machine had a fluctuated trend, increased by 31% at the end of the period.
Regarding household hours, residents tended to ignore it day by day. With almost 50 hours spent on housework in a week, this number saw a remarkable drop in a 3 year-period starting form 1920. There were no changes in housework time until the latter 2000 that it reached 10 hours per week .

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-18 HappyCandy 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he dominance in the use of refrigerator, the proportion of households owning thi...
^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... use of refrigerator, the proportion of households owning this device soared to ...
^^
Line 3, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... households owning this device soared to 90% in 1960, with higher frequency in ap...
^^
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r 2000 that it reached 10 hours per week .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14516129032 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93084654219 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.735714232 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.333333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17809957859 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616449745901 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675202183074 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125712200919 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766349400025 0.056905535591 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.