Children are generally more successful in foreign language studies than adults. Thus , it is better to learn language in childhood.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experiences.
It is often argued that children have more ability to learn new languages than adults so it is more advantageous to learn these skills in the childhood period. I strongly agree with this statement and think that children can benefit from learning a new language in different ways.
It is easier to acquire a new language as a child. Children have the ability to learn quickly as their brain still in the growth phases. Thus, they can absorb new skills in less time including speaking a language. It can be seen that children between the ages of 5-7 have more energy and more motivation to learn. For instance, a recent study shows that preschoolers learn at 3 times the pace of adults. Learning a new language can much be easier as the child’s mind still in the learning process.
Learning language (in early age) can boost career opportunities. Language education is critical for the workforce of the future and being bilingual can broaden career options. People who have learnt a foreign language in their childhood are more likely to get jobs, especially the jobs that require interacting with a different culture. For example, a person who speaks Spanish as the second language can find a job as a tour guide, where he will be in charge of guiding tourists who speak Spanish. Expanding language education creates more opportunities in the work place.
To sum up, I strongly believe that focusing on language skills in early age can be much easier along with bringing more jobs prospects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-17 | mandeephundal | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Austalian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 78
- Children are generally more successful in foreign language studies than adults Thus it is better to learn language in childhood Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experiences 88
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Austalian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 11
- Children can learn effectively by watching television Therefor they should be encourage to watch television regularly at home and at school To what extend do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ning a new language in different ways. It is easier to acquire a new language a...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ong with bringing more jobs prospects.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88326848249 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63304837092 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536964980545 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4959037591 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6428571429 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240416405923 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967701615691 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385762123309 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154692917439 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605705541604 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.