The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate
The pie charts enumerate a survey result which compares the type of cultural and free-time activities boys and girls participate in. At the first glance, boys generally prefer computer games, and outdoor sports while girls mostly participated in activities like dancing, gymnastics and reading.
As is presented in the diagrams, more than one-third boys play computer games while one-quarter play basketball. Moreover, nearly one in five boys plays soccer and one-tenth of them like to do skateboarding. It is prevalent from the illustration that boys mostly play games and take part in outdoor sports. The reading habit among boys is very poor as only 2% of them read. Interestingly, listening to music is an activity which is enjoyed by an equal percentage (10%) of boys and girls.
Moving to the girls’ activities, playing computer games is not as popular among girls as it is among boys. The most popular pursuits among girls are dancing (27% pick this up) and reading (more than one-fifth are active readers). Among outdoor sports and activity, gymnastics and netballs are common among female children as 11% and 15% participate in these two outdoor activities. Interestingly, the ratio of reading among girls is considerably higher than that of boys.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011. 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activitie 56
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children's activities. The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in, whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Austalian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 11
- Children are generally more successful in foreign language studies than adults Thus it is better to learn language in childhood Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant example from your own knowledge or experiences 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21674876847 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83678837655 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1360079027 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2727272727 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184503927739 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779613081171 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827697849975 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151025907192 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102427786579 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.