Compare and contrast online and traditional regular offline classes. Which one do you prefer? Explain why.
These days, especially in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, it is recognized that there has been a lot of change and application of technology in learning. This development has created a new, more convenient form of learning in parallel with traditional classroom learning, which is online studying. These two forms of education have more or fewer similarities and differences. Therefore, this essay will overview the resemblances and dissimilarities between online and traditional education. In my opinion, I enjoy studying online as well as offline, and they both work for me effectively.
In general, online and traditional education systems share similarities, especially with regard to reference materials. Students require reference resources to broaden their knowledge so that both online and offline learners need to have. It is believed that extensive reading of reference materials enhances learners' understanding of lessons. Teachers do not present students with comprehensive knowledge; instead, they highlight a particular issue and leave them seeking further information. As a result, learners are expected to use reference resources to expand their knowledge. Students also utilize reference materials to prepare for coursework and other curriculum-based examinations.
Another similarity between online and conventional education is the method of assessing learners' comprehension. Students in both online and traditional schooling receive them as part of their curricula. Assignments, which are recognized as essential learning components, regardless of whether students are enrolled in online or traditional education, also are designed to assess learners' comprehension of the learning process from an intellectual standpoint. Therefore, they have been included in the curriculum.
On the other hand, there appears to be a considerable difference between online and traditional education systems. Because of its flexibility, online learning is preferable to traditional learning. It enables students to choose when they want to finish their assignments. Students, for example, can learn while working in many job sectors. Learners can also study while carrying out family responsibilities, particularly women and mothers who can take care of their children while studying. In contrast, there is frequently a lack of flexibility in regular class formats. Students must attend classes in person, which generally necessitates a commute and rigorous scheduling.
Online and offline studying are not only different in terms of flexibility but also social interactions. Concerning communication, learners in conventional education systems engage in face-to-face conversations, which create a vibrant learning environment in the classroom. Traditional education allows students to express their views and opinions on course lectures, enhancing students' enthusiasm for learning. Furthermore, teachers can identify the strengths and weaknesses of learners, which can help to improve student achievement. In comparison, online learning often has less interaction between learners and instructors, and among learners, despite functions such as video chat. Online learners do not interact in real-life situations during co-curricular activities, which are essential for improving social interaction.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that these learning modes have their benefits based on different circumstances and conditions. Learners should find their favorite learning method in order to achieve the best results. If possible, it would be better to adopt a new educational system by combining the two.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-06 | hoangganhh2 | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have been included in the curriculum. On the other hand, there appears to be a...
^^^
Line 7, column 642, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...in person, which generally necessitates a commute and rigorous scheduling. Online and...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, in general, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3115.0 1615.20841683 193% => OK
No of words: 512.0 315.596192385 162% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.083984375 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.20363070211 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31811278237 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 176.041082164 160% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548828125 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 966.6 506.74238477 191% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 16.0721442886 193% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.1045989069 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.483870968 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5161290323 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35483870968 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 8.67935871743 219% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179081459277 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493592464247 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514075124895 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.094374073041 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506246453909 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.69 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 170.0 78.4519038076 217% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.