Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
The Internet has brought significant changes to our lives in recent years. Yet, there remains some disagreement about whether the invention of the Internet is the most crucial part of the world history in technology. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, personally, I agree that even though there were a large number of inventions during the development of the world, the Internet invention brought a large impact in social life and became the most essential invention in the world.
First of all, it is undeniable that the Internet had changed the way people communicate. Nowadays, people started to use e-mail and social media to communicate instead of oral communicating. However, it helps individuals who are living far away from home could contact their loved ones and could trade globally also.
Equally importantly, though, the Internet has placed the entire of the world, includes all of the information at our fingertips. In the earlier times, the society had to wait for hours for receiving the information from newspapers. Whereas in contrast, nowadays, the public can access the information at a click of a button. However, not all of the information that people receive on the Internet is reliable and helpful. There was a large amount of offensive, dangerous information appeared on social media or news websites. For instance, there are instructions how to make a bomb appeared on the Internet and could be read by negative individuals.
By the way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that the invention of the Internet had a crucial role in the history of the world improvement and it has brought a positive impact on modern life
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | tranhien297 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Ngân Hà | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Đỗ Thị Ngọc Ngoan | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Đỗ Thị Ngọc Ngoan | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010 73
- Task 2: Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 78
- Age structure of country X in 3 years 1950 2000 2050 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ly, I agree that even though there were a large number of inventions during the development of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...eir loved ones and could trade globally also. Equally importantly, though, the ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...nes and could trade globally also. Equally importantly, though, the Internet has p...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 88, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...laced the entire of the world, includes all of the information at our fingertips. In the e...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 339, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...on at a click of a button. However, not all of the information that people receive on the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, whereas, while, for instance, in contrast, by the way, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12274368231 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87970353736 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534296028881 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6630820044 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.153846154 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0739559550195 0.244688304435 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0254730856768 0.084324248473 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0261867846192 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0405357931025 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275180940497 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.