As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning foreign languages is a waste of time?
To what extend do you agree or disagree
In this modern era, computer translators play a crucial role to translate any language to another in just a matter of time.
There is a discussion among the people, spending time to learn new foreign languages is waste. In my opinion, I disagree
with the statement, the computer does not dominate.
On the one hand, to learn a new foreign language an individual should spend a lot of time and money, apart from their busy life schedule.
If a person is migrating to a different country, then there is a necessity to learn and understand the local language,
Also, they should allocate extra time to attend language classes. In the olden days, it was difficult to communicate in a foreign language unless they learn, however, people nowadays rely on language translators such as Alexa, Siri, google translator,
they translate words of any language quickly and accurately. For Example, google translator accepts voice commands to translate any word. Typically such translators help people to communicate effectively.
On the other hand, people do believe the existence of such devices kills learning and the nativity of the language is lost.
Because translators are designed to provide an appropriate word as requested. Although, it provides meaning which cannot be accurate. Also, it misses the tone of the speaker. People believe understanding any language by learning helps to communicate efficiently.
For Instance, according to recent survey speakers facing difficulty in using translators as they lack accuracy. It is believed
translating using a computer or handheld devices will not help to find the exact meaning of the word.
To Conclude, though computer translators help to translate quickly and effectively, the tone of the speaker, nativity of the language is lost. I disagree with the statement.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-03-06 | SkillAgent | 67 | view |
- Despite a large number of gyms a sedentary lifestyle is gaining popularity in the contemporary world What problems are associated with this What solutions can you suggest 84
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- As computers translate quickly and accurately learning foreign languages is a waste of time To what extend do you agree or disagree 67
- The the two maps below show road access to a city hospital 2007 and 2010 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 139, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Typically,
...s voice commands to translate any word. Typically such translators help people to communi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ovide an appropriate word as requested. Although, it provides meaning which cannot be ac...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, apart from, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33564013841 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92079237959 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2744289013 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7058823529 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 4.38176352705 274% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325707156524 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102665216514 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652122953276 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127373726533 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645056390099 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 139, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Typically,
...s voice commands to translate any word. Typically such translators help people to communi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ovide an appropriate word as requested. Although, it provides meaning which cannot be ac...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, apart from, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33564013841 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92079237959 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539792387543 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.2744289013 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7058823529 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 12.0 4.38176352705 274% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325707156524 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102665216514 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652122953276 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127373726533 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0645056390099 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.