In conclusion, despite the potential benefits of using social media, the drawbacks involved are of greater significance
It is true that nowadays, social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter which are used by many users, are replacing real communication in daily life. Although using Facebook and Twitter has several advantages, the drawbacks may be far more significant.
On the one hand, there can be some minor benefits of using social media platforms. One feasible advantage is that the users can keep in touch with their friends without meeting in real life. For instance, people who study overseas can talk with their friends as well as with their family by using Facebook or Twitter. Besides that, many workers who do not have many times to meet their families can easily talk to their parents. However, I think this benefit is just a few cases of users who do not have time to meet their families. Since many people have many times to go home to visit their parents but they do not.
Nevertheless, using social media can have major downsides, which overshadow these positive effects. The most obvious issue could be that more and more people use Facebook which leads to an inactive life. Since they spend almost their time chatting online without going to interact with their friends in their social life. Beyond that, many users are becoming dependent on the unreal world such as Facebook. This can result in being shy to communicate with their friends in real life.
In conclusion, despite the potential benefits of using social media, the drawbacks involved are of greater significance
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-15 | tranlequihoang | 78 | view |
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 61
- It is sometimes said that countries should produce all the food for their populations to eat and import as little as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 61
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Agree or disagree 78
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...cebook which leads to an inactive life. Since they spend almost their time chatting o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92430278884 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38229689306 2.80592935109 85% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545816733068 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.0256213438 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.2857142857 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222416987187 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112278209065 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.210863647723 0.0667982634062 316% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284815784342 0.151304729494 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.31909766876 0.056905535591 561% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.