convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation to what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

These days, fast food and junk food are the favorite foods of today’s youth because it is really tasty and eye-catching. It is often said that instead of consuming and preparing conventional food, modern people enjoy eating convenience foods; hence, the traditional diet will be replaced by these foods. From my perspective, I strongly disagree with this view as I believe that traditional food is still essential in numerous aspects.
Conventional diet and its ways of preparation play a crucial role in each individual’s life. Firstly, people nowadays still enjoy traditional methods of making food because this is the best way for them to strengthen their family members’ bonds. By making food together, not only will they have a great deal of time confiding in many things happening in their daily lives, but they also can share lots of traditional recipes for the young generation. Secondly, on special holidays, traditional food is the most important diet, and nothing else can replace it. For example, the Tet holidays in Vietnamese people are the best time for family members to reunite in their family to enjoy traditional cuisines as well as remember the unique smell of the food of their parents.
On the other hand, fast foods are also really popular with lots of people around the world because they can consume a wide range of new diets as well as save their own time. However, people just enjoy these foods when they hang out with their peers or on some occasions to enjoy new foods and focus on their special days. Therefore, convenience foods will just be extra foods for modern people to refresh their lives.
To sum up, although fast foods are really prevalent in terms of saving time and experiencing new foods, conventional diets and their methods of preparation are still pivotal since people can reinforce their family members’ bonds and keep their traditional ways of making food in their family.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, for example, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00621118012 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59711270569 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.5105095155 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.333333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333181661255 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156293204341 0.084324248473 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624762625583 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239771187548 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0782199761723 0.056905535591 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.