It is true that convenience foods is becoming increasingly popular nowadays. But I am convinced that traditional foods and traditional ways to make them will not be replaced completely.
Convenience foods are a preferable choice to save time and money in some situations. For those who have to cope with a heavy load of work, it is much easier and more convenient to buy instant foods as their meals in weekdays. Enough nutrition and energy is provided for them with a small amount of time and at reasonable costs in this way. However, tastes of convenience foods are quite limited due to the restricted methods used to process them. People tend to get tired of them if only convenience foods are available.
Traditional foods and cooking methods play a significant role in national culture, which can not be substituted anyway. Certain traditional foods remind us of what happened in the history. For example, Chinese people make and eat rice dumplings on Dragon Boat festival in memory of the poet Qu Yuan who devoted his life to defending his country. The ways to cook some traditional foods also represent the wisdom of people in historical times. The invention of vinegar gave information about the development of technology at that time. These methods and stories can teach us with history and food culture.
In conclusion, fast foods have brought a great deal of convenience to our lives but we still need to keep traditional foods and cooking methods to meet different tastes and reserve the culture behind them.
- The diagrams show the structure of solar panel and its use 67
- The graph below shows the production of three forest industry products in a European country namely timber pulp and paper from 1980 to 2000
- The importance of biodiversity is being more widely recognised as increasing numbers of species come under threat What can be done to maintain biodiversity 61
- The diagram shows the components of a neuron and how it works Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You sh 78
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, however, if, so, still, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9765625 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76327362965 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6015625 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0919981469 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40868945835 0.244688304435 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152001124966 0.084324248473 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0861835190415 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27031785861 0.151304729494 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0735964009214 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.