With the increasing globalization, the multinational companies are easily attract the consumers by increasing the demand of quality products. Consumers are able to consume variety of commodities in the global village because of nations becoming more similar. I will discuss the pros and cons of universalization in the subsequent paragraph.
There are multifarious benefits are taken by both states. To begin with, the availability of the same kind of products throughout the world depicts harmony among countries as well as the consumers can buy the foreign brands such as Nike, Samsung, Apple and...
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: reza_dano
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 84
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is positive or negative development 91
- People doing dangerous sport activities like scuba diving and bungi jumbing, they should be responsible for their own life and rescue workers not risk their lives to save people.Do you agree or disagree. 73
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 71
- Some people think that it is good for a country's culture to import foreign movies and TV programmes. Others think that it is better to produce these locally. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'attracted'.
Suggestion: attracted
... the multinational companies are easily attract the consumers by increasing the demand ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1663.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48844884488 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10567193747 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607260726073 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.0188380082 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.866666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0666666667 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179081390139 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436260386807 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609302027829 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851234581181 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205435942971 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.