Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
In the global era, an availability of the product, such as consumer goods, cars, furniture, and clothes, is not only discovered in the certain country. Almost whole countries in the world had provided the same thing, which means the similarities between various countries are growing.
A reason is that people in different regions now have access to products they could not use before. There are numerous goods which are produced merely in certain parts of the world meaning, which means that people living in other places are not able normally to take benefits to them in the past. Bananas and pineapples, for instance, usually grow in tropical areas did not use to be available to consumers in colder countries like Russia and Canada. Nevertheless, most people in such lands are now able to buy and eat these beneficial fruits.
In addition, people today can travel around the world without hesitating to be homesick as the products which they are used to consume are now available in markets almost wherever they go. Diaspora Indonesian from Makassar living abroad, for example, could not cook their national dish (Palu Butung) in other parts of the globe since the specific ingredients required were not farmed and grown in most other countries. However, as they can access all these ingredients in shops and supermarkets around the world today, they shall work and live more productively because they no longer miss a significant of their cultural heritage anymore.
In conclusion, People shall take such the advantages of beneficial products from other areas in the world, and either traveler, as well as immigrants, can be less stressful considering their homesickness towards their typical meals. I believe the growing similarity between countries around the globe, which have resulted from the availability of goods produced elsewhere, is a desirable development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-08 | Jagdeep kaur | 91 | view |
| 2019-03-13 | behiraha | 78 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | Aimee Lee Lee | 56 | view |
| 2019-01-08 | MilanT | 89 | view |
| 2019-03-11 | Aimee Lee Lee | 73 | view |
- There should be laws to control the amount and type of violence shown on television programs To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 80
- Some people think that getting a degree from university is the best way to guarantee a good job Others believe that it would be better to go straight into work and get experience instead Discuss both sides and give your opinion 72
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Why does it happen? How to solve this problem? 84
- Government should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people say that to reduce traffic congestion in large cities governments should act to reduce the number of cars on the roads Others say that it is the responsibility of individuals to use cars less and public transport more Discuss both these views 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... usually grow in tropical areas did not use to be available to consumers in colder ...
^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to consuming'.
Suggestion: used to consuming
...homesick as the products which they are used to consume are now available in markets almost whe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25249169435 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70057778725 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554817275748 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.5204122975 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.727272727 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174160738249 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675255359405 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404636810858 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107743196839 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0203095984543 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.