Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
As for the development by the time, the interaction among countries become more frequently as well as make more similarly for each country. I strongly believe that it is a positive trend on the earth.
There are several reasons why I believe that the trend is positive. The circumstance proves good technology development as far as the citizens could obtain foreign goods at the home easily. A general example of this trend would be the fact that traveling is the only way to buy foreign goods as long as we aim to get something before, which is inconvenient. But we can be shopping on the online shopping center now to browse the foreign stuff as well as waiting the products arrive at the home via the quickly international transport system. The convenience of buying foreign goods proves that technics is improving sustainable.
On the other hand, the similarity of each country accelerates the communication of each other. it is not seen in modern society rarely that the culture mixing food is discovered. For instance, a new invention “Pizza Bun” is invented between Italy and China, which represent that a new culture would be created as soon as some countries are mixed. Likewise, we may appreciate and observe a stimulation as far as the birth of culture mixing. it is an effective way to bring a variety of creativity to the world via cooperation between the number of countries.
In conclusion, the similarity among the countries may bring a new impact or even change the world positively. Hence, I completely believe that the situation of the similarity trend is a positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-22 | cocococo123 | 56 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has this become a positive or negative development? 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of highschool programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood orteaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...erates the communication of each other. it is not seen in modern society rarely th...
^^
Line 3, column 195, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...ing food is discovered. For instance, a new invention 'Pizza Bun' is invented betwe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 450, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... as far as the birth of culture mixing. it is an effective way to bring a variety ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, likewise, may, similarly, so, well, as for, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9557195572 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94257711762 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538745387454 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0684131746 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9285714286 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172373265853 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522834145191 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059433005728 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119004956122 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0768612188425 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.