Creative artists should always have the freedom to express their ideas in anyway they wish. The government should not restrict what they do. To what extent do you agree with this opinion?
Artists should be able to have the liberty to express their opinions without too many restrictions on them, otherwise the country can no longer develop as there wouldn't be anyone to question the thoughts and motives of others. But even then, some restrictions are needed to to be placed on them to avoid unnecessary conflict and protect the ones on whom harm is intended.
Firstly, artists should have freedom to express themselves, and only then is the country going to move forward. Artists are needed in the society to question and give alternative thoughts on a situation, which is very much needed so that people in general don't just follow a trend or what opinion is popular, instead they will start to think on their own too. For example,Charles Dickens and Victor Hughes in 1880's have questioned and opposed against the England and France governments respectively which helped the nations to move forward.
On contrary, some restrictions are needed to avoid conflict. For artists, while expressing what they think is right, sometimes their opinions might hurt a group of people. Moreover, the society's opinions can be very much influenced by what the artists put out which in some situations can be extremely hurtful. For instance, if an artist expresses his or her opinion on the topic of racial discrimination in a way that it hurts a particular group of people, some part of the society's thoughts on this topic might get influenced by this, which is quite harmful.
In conclusion, artists should be given the freedom to give their opinions, thoughts and ideas but along with the artistic freedom given, restrictions are required too. When that liberty is taken away from the artists, the society will not progress ahead, but then again, if there are no restrictions are placed, the society would be in shambles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-04 | Ramesh Thanneeru | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... country can no longer develop as there wouldnt be anyone to question the thoughts and ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
...even then, some restrictions are needed to to be placed on them to avoid unnecessary ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y much needed so that people in general dont just follow a trend or what opinion is ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Charles
...t to think on their own too. For example,Charles Dickens and Victor Hughes in 1880s hav...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...own too. For example,Charles Dickens and Victor Hughes in 1880s have questioned a...
^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1880s'.
Suggestion: in the 1880s
...mple,Charles Dickens and Victor Hughes in 1880s have questioned and opposed against the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00655737705 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7025623125 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531147540984 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2385179218 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.818181818 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263400264813 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102398723754 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675071363036 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158241280383 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228066354514 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.