Damage to the environment is an inevitable consequence of improvements being made to the standard of living.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
it is often believed that the improvement in the standard of living of people is one of the major causes of damaging the environment. In my opinion, I completely agree that advancement to ensure that people have a decent lifestyle is a major reason leading to environmental destruction.
A good reason leading to environmental damage is the increase in construction by cutting down trees, due to increasing demands of the people for connecting roads, railways, malls, and other buildings lead to an increase in deforestation. As more and more people demand a decent lifestyle when it comes to their accommodation, traveling, or another basis of life. For instance, Rajasthan, in India, is one of the prime examples as the city was rich in natural resources, but in order to meet the demand of people, the country is left with nothing more than barren lands.
On the other hand, environmental damage is equally influenced by a lack of care of society itself. Protecting the environment no longer becomes their priority due to lack of awareness in working lifestyle. people take less concern about their environmental responsibilities thus causing to their surroundings. For example, smog from industrial plants due to weak environmental policy and regulation.
In conclusion, in order to ensure a comfortable lifestyle for humans, we are compromising on the health of our environment. The increasing construction and advancement in technology is a double-edged sword, though it is benefitting the people, leading to mass destruction of the nature around us
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-03-22 | minh23456789 | 11 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is often believed that the improvement ...
^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...lack of awareness in working lifestyle. people take less concern about their environme...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 276, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding nature'?
Suggestion: the surrounding nature
... people, leading to mass destruction of the nature around us
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 249.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29317269076 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3214769543 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558232931727 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0793606912 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.818181818 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0718475468184 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0308659369714 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050779121262 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0471334080191 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476432056981 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.