The dangers of smoking are well known, yet many people continue with this habit.
What are the causes of this? How can we reduce smoking in society?
Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Although Non- profit organization are raising awareness that smoking could have harmful effect on one’s body, and people already realized “What damage it does”, but still many of them continue to smoke. In my opinion, Educating people about the health benefits of smoke free life can have positive result.
Since most of the people know about smoking, and have negative effects on internal organs. Meanwhile, People ‘who are smoking’ on a daily basis suffer from many health issues such as: Lung cancer, Damage to internal organs and Neurological problems. Regular smoking can also reduce one’s life span, and mostly suffering from lung cancer. Meanwhile, Air exhaled after smoking can be inhaled by non-smokers, which would also cause health issues to other people.
Secondly, Government needs to enforce regulations on smoking, and raise more awareness For example: campaign, Educating people about damage it does to organs. Moreover, abandoning smoke will aid one’s well-being. Whereas Advertising is also another form of communication to people. If Government refuses to take responsibility, that could have catastrophic effects on people life. Finally, raising awareness is the crucial part for smoke free life.
In conclusion, although many of the people are aware about effects of smoke. Some people are still habituated. It can only be Reduced with help of Government as well as people's own awareness.
- The charts show how tourism to two countries changed over a 50-year period.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 67
- The dangers of smoking are well known, yet many people continue with this habit.What are the causes of this? How can we reduce smoking in society?Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne (units)2005P 73
- A person's worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 84
- graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...nternal organs. Meanwhile, People 'who are smoking' on a daily basis suffer f...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g smoke will aid one's well-being. Whereas Advertising is also another form of com...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 220.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59090909091 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80125414652 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604545454545 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.4913525963 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8571428571 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203637992356 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801245175884 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469591323098 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146244197416 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391908990718 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.