In this developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing population.
In recent times, the hitches allied to increasing average age are mounting dangerously. The chief objective of this composition is to shed light on some of the issues involved with the growth of life expectancy along with few cogent solutions.
Needless to say, the source of origin of snags related to allotted span are multitudinous. However, the conspicuous among them is the lack of employees. The problem is well explained by the fact that many young adult do not go to work in order to take care of their parents, who is becoming older and older. To plumb this, the apposite sitting can be the number of workers quit their job before retirement age is increasing and one of the reasons is their parents are too old to do everything. Another problem that aggravates the situation is taxes burden for young people. The more retired people, the more money government have to spend. As a repercussion of this the government increase the taxes that employees have to pay. Hence it is perceptible why the increase of aging is perceived as a grave threat.
Several initiatives have been proffered to tackle this critical issue. Having identified the root of the problem, a good remedy can be increase the retirement age, which can be from 70 to 75 years old. As a denouement of this the pressure on government to pay for pension is reduced and society has enough workers. Another worthwhile step to counter this menace is encouraging the immigration. Consequently, the government can have another sources to collect taxes, which makes the tax unchanged. On balance, it can be conjectured that these solutions may help in suppressing the effects of this phenomenon.
It is apparent from the above arguments that obstacles arising from the surge of life expectancy are copious. Notwithstanding, with instantaneous action they can bridled to large magnitude.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-20 | Meomeo11 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | annaalysia007 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | ngo viet | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | ngo viet | 73 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...of this composition is to shed light on some of the issues involved with the growth of life...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 640, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he more money government have to spend. As a repercussion of this the government i...
^^
Line 2, column 728, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e the taxes that employees have to pay. Hence it is perceptible why the increase of a...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'bridle'
Suggestion: bridle
...ing, with instantaneous action they can bridled to large magnitude.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, may, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9935483871 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89927329515 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4512728356 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24201074736 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066938301692 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051666027222 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132702533095 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557664549095 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...of this composition is to shed light on some of the issues involved with the growth of life...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 640, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he more money government have to spend. As a repercussion of this the government i...
^^
Line 2, column 728, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...e the taxes that employees have to pay. Hence it is perceptible why the increase of a...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'bridle'
Suggestion: bridle
...ing, with instantaneous action they can bridled to large magnitude.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, may, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9935483871 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89927329515 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587096774194 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 10.0 2.52805611222 396% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4512728356 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24201074736 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066938301692 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051666027222 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132702533095 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557664549095 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.