Children in rural areas from developing countries experience less educational qualities than that of in developed countries. It is often argued that constructing more schools and recruiting teachers from the city would a good option, whereas some people state that technology such as computers and Internet access brings more benefits than the above idea. This essay agrees with the former suggestion and will discuss both points of view.
It is clear that traditional schools would be suitable for children living in developing countries, especially in rural communities. This suggestion helps increase the educational literacy without involving a great deal of money from the authorities. Furthermore, active direct-studying from teachers exert beneficial impacts of interaction and communication between kids and teachers. It is therefore agreed that providing schools and teachers benefits a lot to children. Ninh Binh in Vietnam is a prime example where young graduated teachers help local kids to increase their ways of communicating as well as reading literacy. It is recorded that an increase of 67% of children could interact, learn how to read and write properly thanks to this solution.
Those opposed to this advocate that delivering technology to these areas provide a better educational systems for local children. It is suggested that the advantages of technology like computers and Internet access provide limitless sources of information and help children gain access to in-depths knowledge without any hindrance. However, this idea was abandoned by many authorities due to its high price for Internet installment. Moreover, students have to be taught how to use computers, but no one spares a minute to guide them, and there is no assurance that they purposefully make the most of it for studying or something else.
In conclusion, despite the advantageous impacts of technology, it is still not considered as a possible solution for gaining knowledge in rural areas of developing countries. Therefore, building more schools and providing qualified teachers would be a better idea to solve the literacy troublesome.
- The diagram below shows time spent watching TV by age and gender in the UK in 1995 and 1999 Summerise the information by selecting the main features and make comparations where relevant 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to the remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- The charts show the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 taking part in cultural activities and sports in Australia in 2003 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of it for studying or something else. In conclusion, despite the advantageous ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1817.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53963414634 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03435459004 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576219512195 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.813022958 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.133333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232139571963 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075919433958 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690473184029 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145764884506 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352818901765 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.