Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give

Essay topics:

Development in technology has brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Technology has been developing at alarming rate in contemporary era. A recent few decades are witness of development in technology sector. Amid this development, there is one phenomenon that has associated with it. In order to this phenomenon, faction of people concede that they need to give the simplest life to tackle the environment problems. Although other believe that technology is only way to combat with this problem. I will try to throw light upon the determination of environment problems. Also, I will try to posit my perspective about it.

To commence with, there are multifarious reasons to shore those people who are in favor of human need to live ordinary life to fight against the problems. First and foremost, people should walk or use cycle instead of cars to clear the environment from exhaust fumes from the car which leads to air pollution. Additionally, people should try to cut the consumption of electricity as well as try to use renewable resources like sun for brightness or some equipment to make dishes through sun rays. In terms of industry sector, they do not depend on machinery or robot which is main source of air contamination but except of machinery, they should work by hand as people can get money from the work and it tend to decline the pollution.

On the other side of spectrum, there are several points that made out in favor of technology is only way to tackle this problems. The predominant reason is developing technology has mach more merits. To prove, advent of electric for commuting to their work or travel. Because it is cheaper and more eco-friendly than fuel car. Moreover, other car need fossil fuel for running on road while electric car need only electricity from whatever sources. The another reason, introducing a machinery related to recycle the paper, bottle or other material is one of the best alternative option to decrease the environmental contamination.

Aggelomerating, all the point, I elaborate an above it can be concluded that pros of technology to mitigate the spread of pollution in atmosphere. Outweigh the cons of it. That is why, I support those people who are in favor of usage of technology is one way to tackle the problem because it is more fruitful in my eyes.

Votes
Average: 8.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-20 VanChungNguyen 73 view
2023-04-27 Bao Ngoc Tho 78 view
2022-09-12 Hai Anh Phan Thi 89 view
2022-08-15 baokhuyen759 89 view
2022-07-28 lehonganh1212 89 view
Essays by user Abhayraj :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ife to tackle the environment problems. Although other believe that technology is only w...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'tends'?
Suggestion: tends
...ople can get money from the work and it tend to decline the pollution. On the oth...
^^^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...vor of technology is only way to tackle this problems. The predominant reason is dev...
^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reason is developing technology has mach more merits. To prove, advent of electri...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 41.998997996 169% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1870.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92105263158 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88615474233 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534210526316 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1252944565 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213281184262 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596732495618 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533117056532 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119018311744 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0464744862097 0.056905535591 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.