Digital communication technology, such as email, instant messaging and social media has improved communication and connections between people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Advancement in technology have made it easier than ever before to reach and interact with people around the globe. This mean that it is also easier to connect and make meaningful relationships with others. I partially agree with proposed thought and reasons for my inclination are articulated in ensuing paragraphs.
Compared to the past, it is now easier, cheaper and more convenient to communicate with people, wherever they may be. Technologies such as instant messaging, email, Skype have transferred the ways in which people communicate with each other. To quote an example, thirty years ago, getting in touch with someone in a different country was difficult and extremely expensive. Today, people can take their phone out of their pocket and contact with other people all over the world with their dear and near once at the push of a button, which can be considered as an epitome.
while technology may have made is easier for people to communicate, is has not improved as much as connections and relationships between people in any meaningful way. Email, instant messaging software or social media websites can never replace face-to-face contact, because more connection is non-verbal. People rely on body language, facial expressions and other subtle cues to understand others. In a text messaging or and email, or even with video chat, those gesture are lost. Connection between people depends on true communication, and true communication is only possible when people take face-to-face.
To wrap up, digital technology has undoutebly changed the way of communication, this is a positive thing. Being able to keep in touch with kith and keen in any corner of the world is a great advantage. Nevertheless, the way in which we connect and form relationships has not changed substantively. People need face-to-face contact to form meaningful connections with others, and correct technology is no substitute for that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | Kaumil Patel | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ich can be considered as an epitome. while technology may have made is easier for ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ap up, digital technology has undoutebly changed the way of communication, this i...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27597402597 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0149508686 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577922077922 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7834045068 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.5625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152973757719 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0530070800003 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542651275334 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875458592989 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598546085945 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.