Do children behave better when they are physically punished or rewarded?
Parents enable to use many methods in teaching children what is right and what is wrong. Some people think that physical punishment can suddenly affect children behavior, while others say rewarding should be a better alternative. This essay will discuss the results of both issues with children.
Physical punishment can be the fastest method that can respond to a child’s fault. Young people will behave better when they are punished because of fear. For example, a mother caned her son because he stole her money, so the boy feared and would not do negative actions in front of his mother; however, he might do when there was no one. Consequently, without advice, punishment could not support young children to clearly and reasonably understand the outcomes from their actions.
On the other hand, rewarding will benefit children in many ways. Giving young children rewards can be a positive reinforcement to motivate them to do great things. Also, this will promote children’s self-esteem and encourage them to become better and more successful. However, rewarding should have conditions that can be used to promote children’s efforts, but those rewards should not be given excessively.
In conclusion, both methods can be used effectively if rational advice is included. Children are still immature and need time from parents to teach and foster them to become altruistic world citizens. In the fast-paced world, there can be no doubt that people’s lives hasten causing the reduction of parents’ time for their children. Last but not least, family time is as important as proper ways to raise a child.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-12 | 1darkness1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | vermaparmish | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | MichaelP | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | Ranjeet brar | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | ishurai96 | 78 | view |
- Language teacher should concentrate only on giving positive feedback when students do good work rather than on criticizing their bad work 67
- Universities should provide students with the skills they will require in order to succeed at their future jobs How far do you agree or disagree with the above opinion What are some of the job skills that employers look for in new employees 91
- Do children behave better when they are physically punished or rewarded 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29118773946 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82250943389 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60153256705 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6061009393 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340383766202 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107300375906 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918575063674 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196072003052 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958426057456 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.