Do children behave better when tvey are punished or rewarded?
Children are the future of the nation and how they should be raised, is a debatable issue. Some people believe that they should be exposed to the physical punishment while other say constant appreciation is required for them. According to me, these arguments need proper scrutinisation before forming any opinion.
To begin with, there are many advantages of conferring rewards to children first of all, appreciation and verbal praise can have a magical impact on the behavior of the children because when they are appreciated for good conduct they come to know about value of good behavior and try to keep continue with that. The more they brim with positive comments, the more they are confident. On the other hand, children who are subjected to artificial physical punishment are seen with lack of self confidence. A survey conducted on behavior of children revealed that a child exposed to punitive actions my parents are more aggressive and furious than others of his age. Hence beatings to child can never be fruitful.
On the contrary, there is no denying the fact that training to the notorious and ferocious mind is a hard nut to crack because it is true that rod the only logic for the fools. Moreover, some children repeat mistakes even after being warned and punished, this type of stubbornness force parents and guardians to give them beatings. Needless to say, over pampering may have adverse effect on children. In this present scenario, parents have one or two children and this pampering distract them away from their path.
To conclude, children are the tender buds and nurturing them is really a major responsibility. Therefore, a fair judgment on behavior is required for good upbringing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-12 | 1darkness1 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | vermaparmish | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-06 | MichaelP | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | Ranjeet brar | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | ishurai96 | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in a european country from 1979 to 2004 67
- The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods in britian. 67
- Some people say that advertising encourage us to buy things that we really do not need others say that advertisements tell us about new products that may improve our lives. Which viewpoint do you agree with? 56
- The chart below show the methods of transportation for people travelling to one university for work or study in 2004 and 2009. 73
- International tourism has enormous benefits at the same time it has some concerns for local inhabitants and the environment. Do the advantages of international tourism outweigh disadvantages. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...tant appreciation is required for them. According to me, these arguments need proper scrutinisa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 664, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ive and furious than others of his age. Hence beatings to child can never be fruitful...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e one or two children and this pampering distract them away from their path. T...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, while, first of all, it is true, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04929577465 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69322697399 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4564795432 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.428571429 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.85714285714 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136460698999 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421860269412 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381268420545 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727886425847 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304938881864 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.