Do the problems brought by international travel outweigh the advantages?
Nowadays, many hold the view that the popularity of visiting different countries is a positive development. At the same time, however, there is a body of opinion which holds that there will be demerits when people are seeing the world. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that global travel can bring in revenues to local countries, because foreign visitors may definitely spend money while visiting, such as eating at restaurants, living in hotels and taking public transportation. In addition, international travel can enrich the aboriginal culture. Compared with the domestic tourists, the ones abroad may spread different cultures of their own when they are visiting, which can obviously make the native nation full of exotic culture.
On the other hand, while the international travel can be beneficial, its problems cannot be ignored. First, it can aggravate the current environmental issues. For example, the airplane that has been applied in the global trips requires a great deal of fossil fuels to take off and fly its passengers to their destinations, which may deplete the traditional fuels in the end. Also, the air quality can be undermined, since when the oil is burnt there will be a large amount of exhaust such as carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide, two main factors of air pollution.
To summarize, there is no doubt that international tourism may bring about economic and cultural benefits. At the same time, however, it can lead to disadvantages for the environment. In the final analysis, therefore, one can only conclude that the drawbacks of international travel are more evident.
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010. 78
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 89
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages? 11
- The bar chart shows the percentage of dependents in five different countries around the world in 2000 and 2050. 73
Comments
People are indeed traveling…
People are indeed traveling more. Perhaps this is due to the fact that traveling has become much easier and a lot is being done to make traveling as easy and comfortable as possible. My last trip abroad was to the Gold Coast in Australia. There I rented a great hotel and car on the website https://14cars.com/car-rental/australia-gold-coast-airport-ool and thanks to this, my trip was as successful as possible and my stay in the city was comfortable
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
Nowadays, many hold the view that the popularity of visitin...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in fact, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16058394161 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88509593793 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605839416058 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.7130219223 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.769230769 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102834087218 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0436715100904 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651295226312 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618166090736 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387672946348 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.