Do you agree or disagree with the following statements? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In today's fast-paced society, people have become occupied with immense tasks at work and at home, which is a widely-accepted reason to explain why people accomplish so few things properly. From my perspective, I comprehensively assent with this outlook.
Admittedly, if people actively multitask, they will be distracted such that they are unable to concentrate or perform their best on every activity. As a result, nothing is viable, especially evident if the jobs are not interlinked. Take me as an emblematic example, in the covid-19 pandemic, when I got stuck at home with the isolation, I tried to learn 5 languages in 3 months. However, I expeditiously fell into complications of the dispute of 5 languages. Therefore, I recognized that everything I had learned in each topic had been for naught. After that, I began to concentrate on improving English and learning elemental Chinese at a time, giving it my undivided attention and efforts.
Furthermore, multitasking implies that people have difficulty in time management. Fair timing plays a vital role in the schedule of individuals. It reflects what type of person is and how they deal with their assigned tasks. People often spend the most time on recreation or do nothing and get stressed when doing a load of work on D-day. Instead, they need a perfect agenda with detailed tasks and do this earnestly. Moreover, people are constantly weary and do not fulfill their goals. In turn, this will negatively influence them and can lead to sadness and failure.
In conclusion, making the schedule in a smart way helps people be successful and healthier.
- In the modern world people no longer need to use food from animals or products from animals such as medicine and clothing To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 78
- Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree 70
- The line graph illustrates the proportion of total expenditure in a certain European country between 1960 and 2000
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 559, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h topic had been for naught. After that, I began to concentrate on improving Engl...
^^
Line 4, column 36, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a smart way" with adverb for "smart"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...re. In conclusion, making the schedule in a smart way helps people be successful and healthie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09056603774 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06211011133 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652830188679 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7717918722 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3125 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189593085196 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511762214493 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593274247764 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976732394305 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681849106087 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.