Nowadays people prefer to buy everything inside a small window. Individuals do not want to invest their huge time in order to purchase anything. As everything is now available under one roof, recently small businesses unable to sustain in this globalization. I, however, tend to disagree with the notion that local communities are on the eve of death. In this essay, I will highlight my point of views and try to provide sound reasoning for my claims.
First and foremost, rapid expansion of supermarkets broaden the horizons for the small bussinesses. In other words, now everything is available in the big shops including some of the contryside's unique art. Instead of salling to the small boundaries, now everything can be reached everwhere easily with the help of global market. For instance, Teracota, which is a local traditional art of Santinikatan, which is a contryside of India, can be easily available in the U.S because it's popularity among the women due to its unique ornament features. Hence, due to supermarket culture local communities can export there creative item across the globe.
Secondly, demand is the key of any local community's survival. To be precise, if there is a demand of a particular item, it will definately help the local community to grow. Despite of the availability of local item inside a specific region, the demand in the current market enhances the supply of local commodities. For example, Kiwi from New Zealand previously available in the local continent only, but today it can be found everywhere in the world. Additionally, the farmers of New Zealand can cultivate more kiwis because of its huge demand in the market. Hence, supermarkets help the local community to grow.
However, lack of education can be harmful towards the local communities. Even though, the business market remains stable most of the time, it is cannot be 100% predictable. I would like to cite an example. In last decade there was a great demand of hand made household things but nowadays the trend has shifted to machine made things. Moreover, people belong to the local business do not have the knowledge of the global current trend and this leads to the death of local business. Therefore, elected officials should take the responsibility to provide the education, which will guide the future pathways, to the local people. So we can say that only proper education can eradicate the coming fatal problems.
To conclude, I would like to reiterate my opinion by saying that, although some local business may face a hard time due to the rapid development of supermarkets, the unique products along with the government's help can help a native community to overcome the future troubles.
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today’s life. Others argue that the history is a value source of information. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- People in all modern societies use drugs, but today’s youth are experimenting with both legal and illegal drugs, and at an increasingly early age. Some sociologists claim that parents and other members of society often set a bad example.Discuss the caus 56
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London. 78
- Some organization believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...is available in the big shops including some of the contrysides unique art. Instead of sall...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...India, can be easily available in the U.S because its popularity among the women ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 41.998997996 162% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2266.0 1615.20841683 140% => OK
No of words: 448.0 315.596192385 142% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05803571429 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83228232745 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529017857143 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 740.7 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2501381977 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4166666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04166666667 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290259884003 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814418581983 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632138282463 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160731967437 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016686139904 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.