There is a controversial opinion of the influence between the initial technology and the contemporary one. Although I somewhat approve that technological growth at the early stage has not only impacted positively but also alternated citizen’s life, I would argue that the later technological development has more significant effects.
The former advent of technology is likely to bring about certain merits and changes to the life of people. To commence with, it is undeniable that the invention of computer has facilitated many aspects of life, in particular at work. Indeed, computer’s creation follows by adopting software like Microsoft office has eased the tension in many people’s work-life. The reason here is that MS office, including works and excels, is programmed to advocate people for completing various tasks simultaneously through a set of useful tools, hence boost the proficiency of workers. The second advantage which should be highlighted is that the noticeable influence of the internet has turned people’s life from the majority of face-to-face dialogue to online communication. In fact, there are several online platforms were invented after the internet, which helps people to make conversation easier and this inevitably becomes widespread throughout the world because of its convenience. To give a testament, in the period of 2003-2005, yahoo messenger is a popular online chatting application, which allows people to access the conversation with anyone around the world.
Despite the explicit effects of the early technological development, I still believe that the later one has rendered people to be exposed by remarkable impacts. Firstly, the burst of smart devices in recent years has marked a huge change in society. The globally piled up of smartphones and tablets with numerous appropriate applications can make people prone to do various activities online that there used to has a common belief that people only can do those by conventional way, such as booking cars, ordering foods, shopping clothes. Secondly, the technological development in modern life has also shorted cut a range of steps in processing and manufacturing, thus enhance the performance in tight time. In fact, human engagement may cause time-consuming in manufactures, not to mention the high risk related to accuracy and injures, meanwhile, a large amount of automatic equipment has been created like robot undoubtedly plays an important role in cutting through all those concerned complexities.
In conclusion, while people can reap a variety of powerful effects from the early technological advancements, I do not believe that the recent ones have changed people’s life extraordinarily.
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- With divorce rates and family breakdowns increasing globally, it is generally accepted that families today are not as close as they used to be.Discuss the causes of this problem and offer some possible solutions to it. 84
- The diagram below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant. 61
- Internet Users as percentage of population 84
- In some country, some high school leavers are choosing to work or travel for a period of time before going to university.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of those school leavers’s decision. Give your own opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 412, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'have'.
Suggestion: have
...us activities online that there used to has a common belief that people only can do...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2315.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59178743961 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24590680546 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 176.041082164 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606280193237 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 737.1 506.74238477 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1696121163 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.333333333 106.682146367 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294191039728 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954109655183 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779916105032 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205638657037 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061153821677 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.