Establishing good relationship in workplace is not important, as the primary goal of every person is to focus on work. To what extent extent do you agree with this statement?
It is argued by many that the main goal of each person on jobsites is to concentrate on work rather than on making healthy relationship. While some demographics of society are in harmony with this suggestion, I strongly disagree with this notion.
It is fairly easy to comprehend why I am in disagreement with this ideology. The preponderant reason is that the friendly behaviour or relation is key of successes because many full-time employees spend their more time in office than their families. if they have good relation with their co-workers, they comfortably concentrate on their work Which increase their productivity. Moreover, if you have good terms with your colleagues, you might ask them for help. For example in some how, if you do not able to come on your work due to some reasons, you can ask your peers to manage your work in that situation. In short ,having few friends on workplace is better for teamwork.
Meanwhile, there are some masses who criticize this suggestion and acknowledge that maintaining good relations with all co-workers is hard. It is difficult to pay attention to everyone's needs and interest ,and be nice with the person who irritate you. For instance, if all trying to make good relations with everyone in their jobsites, much less work would be done.
To sum up, eventhough first aim of people is doing work, having few friends is important on worksites which make employees more comfortable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-30 | Gagandhillon | 56 | view |
- Establishing good relationship in workplace is not important as the primary goal of every person is to focus on work To what extent extent do you agree with this statement 56
- Levels of youth crime are increasing rapidly in most cities around the world what are the reason for this and suggest some solutions 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles
- The table below gives information about population of over 60 years old in regions in 2000 and the predicted numbers of population over 60 in 2050 it also show the world population over 60 in 2000 and 2050 84
- The chart below show the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in newport City Centre from 2003 to 2012 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: SOME_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somehow'?
Suggestion: somehow
... might ask them for help For example in some how if you do not able to come on your work...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... on workplace is better for teamwork Meanwhile there are some masses who criticize thi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng few friends is important on worksites which make employees more comfortable
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in short, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86721991701 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68850851383 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564315352697 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 241.0 20.2975951904 1187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1173.0 106.682146367 1100% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 241.0 20.7667163134 1161% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 78.0 7.06120827912 1105% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227360069679 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.227360069679 0.084324248473 270% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13831684435 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366474076555 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 122.0 13.0946893788 932% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -164.68 50.2224549098 -328% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 96.1 11.3001002004 850% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.45 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 18.8 8.58950901804 219% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 98.4 10.1190380762 972% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.7795591182 538% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.