Eventually, technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Write at least 250 words.
Nowadays technology is improving at a vast sprint but there is also demerit things by affecting the environment and it may jeopardize the people to live in future days. This essay disagrees that technology will combat the nature problems currently what we are facing in our recent generation.
On the one hand, there is a wide range of reasons why people believe that better technologies will help to decipher the environment issues. If technology is getting improving then the environment will be deleterious because technology is getting upgraded as it kills nature in some other ways. For instance, modern cars with a lot up-gradation we can see for that one we have to install industries and the industries will cause the environment by releasing enormous squander to rivers and pollution to the outside.
On the other hand, technology is also improving to resolve global warming but if you compare the result of that with the amount of problem we have on the environment and the result is too negligible. For example, as I mentioned above instance regards for installing industries for the upgradation there is also a solution in oder to control the pollution and waste that recycling has need to adopt in the underground, but most of the industries is not following that process.
In conclusion, technologies are improving to combat nature issues and for the environment deleterious, if you compare between them only 20% of technology is improving in resolving the environment issue and the remaining part is creating problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 67
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. 67
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 67
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 67
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet.What are the causes of this problem? How could it be solved? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1297.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14682539683 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97447304945 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.3535934666 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.125 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.125 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136783528054 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706370134553 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532969008998 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928503727539 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474597886241 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.