Every day, millions of tons of food are wasted all over the world. Why do you think this is happening? And how can we solve this problem?
In today’s modern society, the rapid development of many countries leads to raised living standards where people have more than enough on their basic needs such as food. It is said that there is a huge amount of food wasted in our daily life which is detrimental to the environment and needs to be the center of people’s concentration. While a numerous of reasons cause this argument, I believe there are also many ways to alleviate this issue.
On one hand, it is not redundant to mention about our past life, our ancient past has gone through many tough conditions, war and starvation for example, because of that they have a strong insight of the importance of food which is strongly needed for survival. However, when the wars were over and gave space for peace, people nowadays do not experience starvation and have the freedom to choose what to eat, when to eat, and the amount that leads to the value of food decreased dramatically. Moreover, children learn from their parents, the education of appreciating what we eat becomes unnecessary for the younger generation. For example, from my childhood, my aunty told me to just leave the food if I couldn’t absorb it so that I was impacted deeply and created the habit of leaving food on waste. Through the example, the major explanation for this phenomenon would be the wrong lesson that parents teach their kids.
As unacceptable as it is, fortunately there are also schools of solution which enhance the young generations' insight, investing in influencers and regulating restaurants is going to be the most considerable. Firstly, young people can be seen as our future and we depend on their actions. The government should investigate finances on reintroducing the value of food in school classes, the history of starvation and unlock their awareness of what will cost as the consequence if food is continuing to be thrown away, by developing their knowledge that means our next couple of years would be potentially improved. Furthermore, the government should be concerned about consuming wealth as an investment on influencers. The technology developed with the invention of social media, where people are vulnerable to being affected by the populars people, especially teenagers, due to that reason as well as using their images as an encouragement to motivate viewers from preventing food wasting. Last but not least, restaurants cost more money from customers based on their food wasted as the punishment to regulate people to order enough and encourage them to bring it home instead of throwing it away.
In summary, there are plenty of justifications for people wasting food, but luckily there are also a number of ways to relieve the situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-17 | nguyenkhangtriem | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-17 | nguyenkhangtriem | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | mytinh | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-28 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | giangngoc | 82 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also many ways to alleviate this issue. On one hand, it is not redundant to ment...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'generations'' or 'generation's'?
Suggestion: generations'; generation's
...ols of solution which enhance the young generations insight, investing in influencers and r...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...starvation and unlock their awareness of what will cost as the consequence if foo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, well, while, for example, in summary, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2276.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 451.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0465631929 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84830495848 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549889135255 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.760821194 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.733333333 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0666666667 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112002858495 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420579706127 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0299650540799 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742956690303 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199170005207 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.