The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today To what extent do you agree or disagree

In this modern era of science and technology the consumption of fossil fuels is increasing rapidly. These fuels are non renewable resources due to this safer alternative can be used.

I strongly agree with the statement that safer alternative to fossil fuel should be a global priority. There are many reasons behind this fact. Primarily, burning of fossil fuels carbon monoxide is produce that lead to global warming and pollution in the economy. Therefore, it effects on the health of human as well as flora and fauna. This is a wake up call for human being to save the earth as it is a responsibility of to use safer alternative like wind mill, bio gas and solar system. Further due to this it is a global priority to use safer alternative to fossil fuels.

Undoubtedly, fossil fuel become a basic need of human life. It is necessary from cooking gas to loco motors including vehicles and factories. Man has a responsibility to take care of natural resources and this planet earth. Moreover, human being a mortal have responsibility to save resources for future generations.

In the epligoue, every spices have fundamental right to live healthy and in happiness. Therefore, it is necessary to consume safer and best alternative to fossil fuel. It is pointless to cry when al things go wrong.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (4 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on in the economy. Therefore, it effects on the health of human as well as flora ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as to, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1083.0 1615.20841683 67% => OK
No of words: 221.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90045248869 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8703266016 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 176.041082164 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561085972851 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.5008175975 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.2 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7333333333 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.46666666667 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204892990139 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717299851838 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081879067801 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118425642164 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635556586782 0.056905535591 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.