Developmental goals have been evolving since the millennial years with focuses on different world's problems including global warming . The only way out seems to be seeking another option of combustive fuels which I vehemently agree should be a major advocate . The benefits are far overwhelming with little disadvantages.
Global warming is not a new phenomenon, it has been in existent since ice age yet we are not properly prepared for it's dire consequence. Though, humans are largely responsible for it's effect to the planet with activities such as burning of fossils fuel, magnamious industrialisation, deforestation, all these contributing to an imbalance in the ecosystem as well as a disruption of the atmosphere' ozone layer. In a Scientific journal(1998), it was estimated that planet earth will become inhabitable by year 2070 due to the increment in man's noxious activities which is destroying the earth. But, we have done little or nothing to redeem the world from this man-made predicted apocalypse.
If we begin to advocate for a new , safer method of creating energy, we can save living things from this redeemable destruction. We need to begin to discover and invent a friendly atmospheric energy source also begin to make full use of natural sources available to give us light. For example, frontliners need to educate the populace on the usability of solar panels, green houses, proper disposition of refuse(discarding burning and other unsafe means of refuse disposal). If they do and also make it available, more and more people will pick up these newer methods. There is also need for the government to invest largely into novel scientific approach for conservation of the the earth and it' s reserve.
To sum up, all efforts should go into finding a recent and healthier way to create energy. People should be educated, made aware of the importance to find an alternative source of fuels.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...worlds problems including global warming . The only way out seems to be seeking an...
^^
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...emently agree should be a major advocate . The benefits are far overwhelming with ...
^^
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...yet we are not properly prepared for its dire consequence. Though, humans are lar...
^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s well as a disruption of the atmosphere ozone layer. In a Scientific journal1998...
^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...se. If we begin to advocate for a new , safer method of creating energy, we can...
^^
Line 5, column 675, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...scientific approach for conservation of the the earth and it s reserve. To sum up, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 675, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...scientific approach for conservation of the the earth and it s reserve. To sum up, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 11, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e earth and it s reserve. To sum up, all efforts should go into finding a rec...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15112540193 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04999120437 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64308681672 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3954754619 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.428571429 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101214726895 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341794836549 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519070179579 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723722073522 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490847492851 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.