Farmers within a country are often protected by tariffs - that is, special taxes on imported food. Such policies are necessary and should be implemented wherever possible.To what extent do you agree with this?Give reasons for your answer, and include any

Farmers have frequently paid less taxes on imported food. The law that makes it possible should be implemented in any country. In this essay, I will support this idea since I believe it certainly helps farmers in their financial lives as well as makes this kind of job more attractive to other people.

Even though agriculture is sometimes one of the primary ways to make money for some countries, the ones that put high taxes on farming tend to make the job less attractive and damages the financial live of the workers.
Also, it is important to consider that the majority of these workers, most of the times, have no high education and that their jobs demands too much from them. Therefore, setting up a system that provides them a higher wage with less tariffs means that they will have a better life quality, which is important for any human being.

Some may argue that it is unrealistic to say that every country should be taxing less their farmers since some simply are not capable of doing so. For instance, the impoverished countries shows instability economically. Hence, they must implement higher taxes than other places. However, it may be a lack of well management towards their finances.

In conclusion, some countries tax less their farmers and it should be like that anywhere. Such policies would improve the lives of farmers as well as make farming beckon to other people. Finally, poor countries might be managing their finances poorly which makes the taxes upon farming higher than the required.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... these workers, most of the times, have no high education and that their jobs dema...
^^
Line 4, column 229, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun tariffs is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...m that provides them a higher wage with less tariffs means that they will have a bet...
^^^^
Line 4, column 234, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tariffs'' or 'tariff's'?
Suggestion: tariffs'; tariff's
...t provides them a higher wage with less tariffs means that they will have a better life...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...ortant for any human being. Some may argue that it is unrealistic to say that ever...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 299, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun well seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lack of wells'.
Suggestion: a lack of wells
...s than other places. However, it may be a lack of well management towards their finances. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91472868217 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46445800777 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.147425855 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5384615385 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210489096078 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850891636866 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442842224442 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117351718043 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530613256305 0.056905535591 93% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.