It is true that fast food chains are easily found in numerous countries and becoming more irreplaceable in this day age. Albeit its generally acknowledged benefits, I am of the opinion that this new kind of meal also brings detrimental impact to humanity due to its health undermining as well as devaluing family tie.
First of all, pre-prepared food is inextricably linked to deterioration in people’s health status. Apparently, higher level of obesity is a widespread trend in big cities which is mainly caused by the habits of having fast food, as many international fast food corporations such as KFC, McDonald’s, Burger King and so on expand globally, it is definitely harder for people to resist such appealing meals considering its time efficiency and affordable price. Moreover, this expansion should be responsible for not only obesity but also diabetes and heart diseases.
Secondly, fast food possibly jeopardizes family values it sets superficial trends causing less interaction among every family members in the daily perspective. There is no doubt that the more people eat in fast food-serving restaurants, the more likely they skip having dinner at home. It weakens close-knit relationship and widens the gap between generations in family. The situation might get worse if one starts actively following this trend and ignore their traditions and customers.
Al in all, the advantages of fast food are far outweighed by its drawbacks. I personally believe that people should not have pre-prepared food on a regular basis because of those aforementioned potential effects.
- The charts show information about the number of UK university students and government spending and types of student s family economic background in 1991 82
- Anybody can use a mobile phone to answer the work and personal calls at any time or 7 days a week. Is this development positive or negative for both individuals and society? Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 93
- The charts show information about the number of UK university students and government spending and types of student's family economic background in 1991. 67
- The consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat. 61
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country’s development and progress. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 386, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... and no longer stimulates the taste buds.. Secondly, junk food are not only afford...
^^
Line 3, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not only affordable but also convenient on the move lifestyle. For example, when...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ders have eating habits of fast food In conclusion, although there are some adv...
^^
Line 7, column 71, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
...are some advantages of fast food, It is seem to me that junk food abuse triggers ma...
^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ages of fast food, It is seem to me that junk food abuse triggers many harmful th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15017064846 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69047639541 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651877133106 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.441650278 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.75 7.06120827912 209% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201517098537 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726822146252 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559927240684 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133952823446 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691133738599 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.