In recent years, a tremendous increase been observed in the consumption of fast food all around the world. However, there remains some disagreement whether the impact of fast food has been positive or negative. Although there are some valid arguments, in this essay, I intend to argue that the drawbacks of fast food as equally as its benefits.
On the one hand, it is an indisputable fact that consumers fast food pursue the risky eating habit which leads to excess results in health problems. Fast foods, which are incredibly high in fat and salt, are responsible for gaining weight, rising blood fat and blood pressure that can earn irreparable damages for human bodies. One particularly good example of this is a published report from the world health organization (WHO) in which almost 13.2 of mortality in whole the world stem from obstruction of the heart arteries due to the fat which leads to heart attack. Hence, by enhancing the rate of consuming fast foods, the rate of mortality is on the increase. Admittedly, the advantage of fast food should be considered.
In contrast, fast foods are more affordable and convenient compared to traditional foods. For Example, most of the fast food restaurants provide foods to half price to the students, so such foods are a reasonable choice for college students who have a restricted budget. Also, these proper opt for the businessman who has a limited time for eating. Moreover, by launching fast food restaurants, business owners provide a lot of job opportunities for talented people. Therefore, the low cost and convenience are both advantages of fast foods that play a key role in increasing the pace of life.
By way of conclusion, the detrimental effect of fast foods is proved and we have to mitigate while sometimes eating them is an inevitable issue. Once again I reaffirm my position that fast foods have negative influences because of their excess salty and oily compounds whereas are convenient and affordable.
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades. Although some of these changes have been negative, the overall effect of this technology has been positive. What are your opinions on this? 78
- Some people think that the government should not give international aid since they have disadvantaged people like unemployment and homeless in their country To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many elderly people are no long er looked after by their families but are put in care home or nursing home. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 78
- 43 The following appeared in a memorandum written by the chairperson of the West Egg Town Council Two years ago consultants predicted that West Egg s landfill which is used for garbage disposal would be completely filled within five years During the past 57
- In many countries traditional food is being replaced by international fast food. This has negative effects on both families and societies. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: EQUALLY_AS[1]
Message: Don't say 'equally as'. You can use either 'equally' or 'as' on its own. When comparing two nouns, use 'just as'.
Suggestion: equally; as; just as
...rgue that the drawbacks of fast food as equally as its benefits. On the one hand, it is...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03647416413 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78946555107 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580547112462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9738689562 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9333333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200812845069 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743199172303 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423580321556 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130212297214 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518090914268 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.