Fewer students are studying science at school and university, favouring more computer-based subjects instead.
Is this a positive or negative development? What are the reasons for this?
Many people believe that IT-based courses at universities and high schools are becoming highly popular among students and that there is a substitution in the number of the other subjects learners toward this area of study. In this essay, I would argue that this development, ascribed to a host of factors, is likely to be positive.
Several justifications are discussing how this trend could be beneficial. Firstly, plenty of enterprises are employing workers with expertise in IT and similar computer-based subjects, which provides plenty of job opportunities and future career progression for the graduates. Browsing around the Internet, it is now not difficult for us to come across advertisements, ranging from Amazon to Microsoft, recruiting people with computing degrees. Therefore, while pursuing a career in Physics or Biology seems to put us at risk of being unemployed, computer-based subject scholars are likely to have better job security. Secondly, focusing on this area of study could lead to new inventions and technological breakthroughs, contributing to the future prosperity of our country.
However, we should consider that the rise of AI and the specialized area of knowledge, in general, are not that surprising and novel, provided with how ubiquitous and omnipresent the computing industry are in our daily life. The chances are that the influence of technology on us, combined with our dependence on the algorithm and the automation industry has, in the long-term, shaped our way of thinking and attracted us to study technology. In addition, science courses are primarily theoretical, which have been perceived as tedious and unappealing. According to some people, scientists such as Einstein, despite their high level of intellect, are rather unglamorous and lack self-care ability. This has made us form a negative impression about these subjects.
In conclusion, given the fact that there has been a change of interest from science towards IT and computing areas of study, which are associated with various reasons, I expect this to be a positive effect, based on the advantages of learning this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-24 | huyen002 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | huyen002 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-13 | Phạm Minh Quang | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | Ahmad Gelora Mahardika | 82 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | Trần Khôi Nguyên | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed on the advantages of learning this.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41141141141 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12193035666 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597597597598 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5297196156 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.615384615 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264961612705 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845900927332 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606064985869 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166143538304 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609771110108 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.