Fewer young people choose to work in farming. What are the reasons?
Should young people be encouraged to do farming work?
There is no denying that agriculture is one of the major aspects of most nations. In light of this, a decrease in young people choosing to work in farming has become a topic of general interest among citizens. Although this is because of the deficiency of economic opportunities and the young’s preference, I believe the young still should be encouraged to work in the farming field.
There are some reasons why many more young people refuse to do farming work. This is because they are unprovided with financial prosperity. In a knowledge-based society, new generations tend to bias non-manual affairs and avoid labour works to their best possibility. The farming field does not have a ladder structure which facilitates people to have higher positions and life changes, so they hardly ever made a jump to enhance their living standards. In addition, farming is usually located in rural areas where vast spaces for fields and planting are available. The environment might be less vivid compared to urban areas; therefore, it does not fit the majority of young people’s preferences.
In my opinion, there is still a need to encourage young people to do farming work. This is because the young are the energetic and creative labour force to boost the national economy. Besides providing food sources for the citizens’ consumption, agricultural products are also potential export goods to the international market to cooperate, connect and exchange. Vietnam’s rice export, for example, has ranked second just after Thailand for many years globally. With their constant approach to new trends of the modern day, young people can develop many outstanding campaigns. Moreover, the unemployment issue in cities can also be addressed. With the application of technology into agriculture, human resource is consistently in need to run the machinery and ensure the quality of crops.
In conclusion, the fall of young people deciding to work in farming can be explained by the scarce chances of improving their living conditions and preferences. In front of this, they should be encouraged to participate in farming work with potential financial promises for the country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-22 | uyenmia | 84 | view |
| 2023-09-22 | hinhin411 | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | phuong_anh_07 | 58 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | thaoduong1902 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
- The pie graphs below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate Write a report descri 78
- Interviews form the basic selecting criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and that there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table shows the average salaries in US dollars in five countries at different stages until achieving the maximum salary 78
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational equality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both view 84
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, moreover, second, so, still, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29106628242 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92272161781 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567723342939 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7773284287 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2777777778 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490524727815 0.244688304435 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154101709995 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162248197507 0.0667982634062 243% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334501340889 0.151304729494 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791320277377 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.