Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession.
Is this a positive or negative development?
Social media has been developing everyday and celebrities are attracting more attention in comparison to the last decades when magazines and TV were the most important ways to convey meaning. Some believe that stars maintain their ideas in some subjects that are not experts and it is negative advancements while others claim it has positive effect on the society. I rather agree with former group. I will discuss both views and then, I am going to explain mine.
On the one hand, some people count various reasons to prove the positivity of sharing celebrities’ ideas on public. Firstly, they believe the legendary people can aware the public for different issues like greenhouse emission or water scarcity. Then, people by following the instructions could enhance the situation. Another reason that they maintain is that they could expand kindness and caring on the public. As an example Jennifer Lopez is trying to improve African’s lifestyles by taking advantage of her reputation.
On the other hand, some consider sharing stars ideas on the public as a negative development. They maintain lack of knowledge in the all matters as a reason. A few decades ago, when social media was not developed, people had studied about public problems. They used to follow experts’ advices, while people are less follow their suggestions now and it may lead to mislead the society. Furthermore, some well-known persons may abuse their fame for personal purposes. For example, some celebrities support some regulations and deny others to assure their financial success.
Turning to my opinion, I reckon sharing celebrities’ ideas on public about the subjects that are not their profession has several disadvantages. It may mislead the society and correcting their actions may cost huge money and even lives. For instance, some celebrities encouraged public to avoid vaccination for Covid-19 and it costs lives of thousands people.
In conclusion, although some may claim several advantages for distributing starts’ opinions, I think it has several drawbacks on the public.
- When international media including movies fashion shows advertisements and other TV programmes convey the same messages to the global audience people argue that the expansion of international media has negative impacts on cultural diversity What is your o 56
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
- Some people become famous when they are at a young age Do you think this is positive or negative 61
- Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 54
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
Social media has been developing everyday and celebrities are attracting more att...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 412, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...pand kindness and caring on the public. As an example Jennifer Lopez is trying to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, i reckon, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32926829268 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8065212578 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57012195122 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9906680479 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2631578947 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234505440012 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686370092829 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565278903785 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123775451829 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595386182773 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.