Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree and disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, it is fairly prevalent in manifold tourism spots that foreign visitors are bound to pay high prices for souvenirs, goods in there. Some people consider that tourists from overseas should be charged more than local visitors, and I entirely disagree with this idea.
The argument in favor of higher prices for foreign visitors often occurs due to the viewpoint that people from other countries gain more income than the locals, and the difference of the currency unit; however, this is not always accurate. International visitors come from many countries in the world, in which there are developing countries with great earnings, but a lot of people’s countries are less modern or even poorer. That is the reason why this is not equal to everyone. Additionally, travel is about creating a mutual understanding between people of different cultures, backgrounds and faiths all over the world, which is also a chance for locals to start relationships and have more opportunities. For instance, Ho Chi Minh mausoleum, a famous historical attraction, makes no charges for visitors, who are able to learn more about Vietnamese history and the life of one of the greatest person in here. This is also a method to promote the historical beauty of Vietnam to foreign people.
If traveler from other countries realize that they are being ripped off more than the indigenous visitors, a bad impression about the locals and these attractions will be embedded in their mind. To take the foods in Vietnam as an example, the price of a box of shaking strawberries with pepper and salt sold to the foreign visitors in a tourism spot could be double compared with local visitors. As a result, this leads to the decline in the number of visitors coming to that place, so that locals could gain much lesser money from their main jobs. With the decrease in income, those cultural and historical attractions cannot be covered maintenance fees, which results in the regional economic crisis and poorer living conditions and facilities.
In conclusion, I suppose that the government and countries should make effort to attract and promote their fascinating cultural and historical spots to the foreign visitors, and it is not sensible to make them pay higher prices than the local visitors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-11 | Johndavisvu | 78 | view |
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 78
- The graph below shows changes in young adult unemployment rates in England between 1993 and 2012 73
- The pictures show information about average income and spending on food and clothes by an average family in a city in the UK 67
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08244680851 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70934154952 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534574468085 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.8479754054 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.9230769231 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07692307692 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345896984937 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119372417494 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474489918401 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223389392251 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363456541077 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.