Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Is this a positive or negative development ?
The industrialization has shaped our recent world. Although it brings lot of benefits to humanity, its reliance on fossil fuel as primary suppliment takes a toll on the environment. To solve this issue, some countries begin using renewable energy. While this measure is not completely ideal, I believe this phenenomenon is a positive development.
On the one hand, the advantages of green energy over are still called into question. Firstly, it is prohibitively expensive to install the infrastructures to exploit these new sources of energy, which means it can be out of reach for some remote areas. Secondly, the use of renewable energy is not the ultimate remedy to perennial environmental issues. For example, the solar panels can seriously damage the nature when they are disposed, let alone the carbon footprint they left through manufacturing process. Hence, the suitable use of fossil fuels is still the most feasible solution to tackle the environmental problems.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits of sustainable energy sources surpass their drawbacks. First, renewable energies like wind, solar, hydro powers are more eco-friendly as they release little or almost no emissions into the nature. Since these green-house gases is the blame for the global warming, cutting on these gases can slow down the warming process. Second, most of the alternative energies are ubiquitous and can be replenished. They are our natural factors such as sunlight and wind, so they never exhaust and can be easier to be extracted as they do not need exploiting from somewhere deep ocean floor like oil.
In conclusion, while some aspect of renewable powers are left to be desired, I think that their pros outweigh their cons.
- some students prefer to take a gap year between high school and university to work or travel Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 85
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of it 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 89
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87338241983 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614285714286 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4823244873 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230137913921 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762419769798 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601142369567 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122176734501 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612165744625 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.