In the future all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers.
Do you think the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?
It is widely anticipated that in the years to come, driverless automobiles would gradually takeover human drivers and be common on the roads. However, there is no consensus on whether driverless cars do more good than harm. I opine that while some drawbacks definitely exist, the benefits of vehicles without drivers exceed them and that such automobiles are the future of human transportation.
Critics often hold the opinion that when malfunctions or emergency occurs, passengers in the driverless cars would be difficult to control the car to prevent further damage and save their lives. It also raises a question of who should be responsible when accidents occur: the passengers, the robot cars or the car manufacturers. Another downside commonly discussed is that it may cause further job losses in the harsh society where employment is already a problem that manifests. Where would bus and truck drivers go once robot take over them?
Despite the critiques, there are many noticeable advantages that can be brought about by automatic vehicles which could hugely benefit the human society. Firstly, it could greatly enhance the safety of travelling that could eliminate dangers caused by human factors. Nowadays, drunk driving is a main player in road accident. After dining outside or participating in parties, many people could be too drunk to drive but still confident that they are conscious and would not run into trouble. By introducing driverless cars, such matters could be prevented and benefit not only the drivers and passengers themselves, but the lives of other drivers and the pedestrians. The same goes for drivers who could easily enter a state of road rage. Besides, with advanced detectors and algorithms, the robotic cars could solve the problem of congestion on the roads and enhancing travelling efficiency by selecting the best route and driving orderly. Last but not least, robotic cars would require regular updates and maintenance, which could provide new job opportunities.
In conclusion, automobiles without human drivers is the future solution for travelling and its positive side is greater than its disadvantages. Over time, technology would improve and the downsides could be effectively solved.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-10 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | brew | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | aliceali | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-20 | butterflyluo | 73 | view |
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should the government give more financial support to local film industries 56
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 89
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Only movies that can teach us something about real life is worth watching 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, still, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38636363636 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8246294919 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579545454545 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4445924642 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.529411765 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7058823529 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207641843957 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633420897926 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481343061675 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123943165184 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329668093437 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.