It is not irrefutable that the tremendous world population increasing day by day. In the modern era, it seems it will be an enormous problem to live on the field. Therefore, few masses consider that more expenditure on found others planets for living, viz Mars. I agree with this notion and I explain my perspective in the following paragraphs.
To embark with, the favour of notion there are abundant of factors behind the rubric due to future life. First and foremost, it is clear that the individual to distribution their living place in the infants. To explain it, behind major reason is that nowadays the upcoming generation does not prefer to live with a joint family. In the case of, in the scenario can look at the majority of the masses are an investment of enormous earth, because they thought about to come in the future life of the infants. Thus, While it behind of increase of bad impact in life and wastage of the economy.
Furthermore, it is no doubt that gaining of population and pollution in the today life, owing to this despite individual face to more difficulties in beings life. That's why fulfil this requirement is increased to researching the new planet. Moreover, people should that growing more trees on earth, instead of will reduce portion. Due to global industries will devolving completely.
To sum up, I strongly support this given notion. We can not neglect that live people life is more hazardous these days
- Alternative sources that use the natural power of wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Advertising influences people to buy things such as clothes and shoes What are the problems caused by that What solutions can be given 73
- Alternative sources that use the natural power of wind waves and sun are too expensive and complicated to replace the coal oil and gas that we use to power our cities and transport To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 67
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ce to more difficulties in beings life. Thats why fulfil this requirement is increase...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'devolve'
Suggestion: devolve
... portion. Due to global industries will devolving completely. To sum up, I strongly su...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people life is more hazardous these days
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1615.20841683 75% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86290322581 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64111364192 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.5366793746 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234337908022 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699461826953 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639330623152 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140074097853 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486394662449 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.